Every day a position remains open, it costs your business money. It affects productivity and puts extra pressure on your existing team. Many hiring managers face the same difficult challenge: finding the right person quickly without making a mistake. The metric used to track this speed is time-to-fill. Understanding and managing this number is necessary for maintaining a healthy and productive workforce.
You do not need to choose between speed and quality. By adjusting your vetting procedures and using modern tools, you can identify strong candidates faster. This guide outlines specific techniques to reduce the time it takes to vet and hire new employees.

This metric tracks the number of calendar days it takes to find and hire a new employee. It usually starts when a hiring manager submits a job requisition and ends when a candidate accepts an offer. It is different from "time to hire," which only measures the time from when a specific candidate applies to when they accept.
Tracking this data allows you to see the efficiency of your recruitment strategy. A high number suggests you have inefficiencies in your process. These inefficiencies lead to several problems:
Before you can improve your speed, you must find where the delays happen. Most organizations face similar obstacles that pause the hiring momentum. You should review your current workflow and look for these common issues:
You must audit your process to see which of these factors affects you the most. Once you identify the problem areas, you can apply specific solutions to fix them.
Technology offers the most significant opportunity to speed up your hiring. Specifically, AI recruitment tools can handle the initial vetting stages much faster than a human can. This allows you to focus your time on the most promising candidates.
Manual resume review is often the biggest bottleneck. An automated system can scan resumes instantly to check for required qualifications. However, scanning text is not always enough. You need to verify that a candidate can actually do the job.
This is where assessment tools become valuable. You can set up automated skill tests that candidates complete immediately after applying. This filters out unqualified applicants before you even speak to them. You need methods that work without constant manual input. Implementing smarter, faster hiring solutions allows you to gauge candidate abilities instantly through automated assessments.
Scheduling the first phone screen is often difficult. You play phone tag with candidates, and this wastes valuable time. Asynchronous video interviews solve this problem.
Waiting for references to return calls is a classic delay. Traditional reference checking involves leaving voicemails and chasing people down. Automated systems send digital surveys to referees. They can complete these surveys on their mobile devices at any time. This often reduces the turnaround time from days to hours.
The interview stage is where many hiring managers lose control of the timeline. Without a plan, interviews can meander, and decision-making becomes subjective. A structured interview process keeps everything moving forward.
You do not need five rounds of interviews for most roles. Each additional round adds days to your time-to-fill. Aim for a consolidated approach:
Subjective feelings lead to hesitation. When interviewers rely on "gut feeling," they often ask for "one more interview" to be sure. Scorecards eliminate this doubt.
This data-driven approach allows you to compare candidates objectively and make a final choice without delay.
The final hurdle is the decision itself. Hesitation at the offer stage can cause you to lose your preferred candidate to a faster competitor. You must be prepared to move quickly once the vetting is complete.
Do not wait until you find a candidate to get budget approval for the salary. Have the salary range and offer details approved before you start interviewing. This allows you to generate an offer letter the same day you make a decision.
Establish a rule for your hiring team: all feedback must be submitted within 24 hours of an interview. If a debrief meeting is necessary, schedule it immediately following the final interview. This keeps the information fresh and prevents the process from dragging on.
Speed is also about keeping the candidate engaged. If you go silent for a week, the candidate assumes you are not interested.
Benchmarks vary by industry and role difficulty. However, the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) often cites an average of around 36 to 42 days. Roles in high demand, such as engineering or healthcare, may take longer. Your goal should be to improve upon your own historical data rather than strictly following industry averages.
No, not if you use the right techniques. Speeding up the process by skipping steps is dangerous. However, removing administrative delays and using AI recruitment tools to filter candidates actually improves quality. It ensures you see the best talent before they accept other offers.
You should review your recruitment data on a quarterly basis. Look for trends. If the time increases, investigate which stage is causing the slowdown. Regular reviews help you catch issues early.
Reducing the time it takes to fill a position is a manageable goal. It requires a shift from manual, reactive processes to automated, proactive strategies. by identifying bottlenecks, using technology for vetting, and structuring your interviews, you position your organization to secure top talent before the competition.
Speed is a competitive advantage. When you respect the candidate's time and move with purpose, you improve your employer brand and your internal productivity. Start by auditing your current workflow today. Look for one manual task you can automate or one interview round you can combine. Small changes in your process will yield significant results in your hiring speed and overall business success.